After going through the reviewers comments, the editor will make a decision about your manuscript. A reject decision at this stage is final and cannot be reversed. In cases where authors opt in to publication of peer reviewer comments and reviewers opt in to being named, we will not link a reviewers name to their report unless they choose to sign their comments to the author with their name. Such quick changes may mean a glitch, but given that its a Nature journal, thats unlikely. . What does the distribution of wait times for a editor decision look like for a manuscript submitted to Science or Nature? Which type of forging is used for Flashless forging? Disconnect between goals and daily tasksIs it me, or the industry? These are very political journals. I am at the same stage. independence from the authors and their institutions, ability to evaluate the technical aspects of the paper fully and fairly, currently or recently assessing related submissions. Until then, you may find it worthwhile to go through the following resources about journal statuses: Answered by Irfan Syed Editors will not send resubmitted papers to the reviewers if it seems that the authors have not made a serious attempt to address all the referees criticisms. Calm down, and wait a few days before starting your response, then re-read the version of the paper that you actually submitted. Weigh all of your options and look at the merits of the rejection. Obviously, the most difficult situations are those in which the reviewers arrive at nearly or . paper acceptance probability in case of long peer review time for the 1st decision. Wishing you the best of luck on your paper. [CDATA[> Not only do you need to try your luck at another journal, you also receive preciously little advice how to improve your chances. Often, Editors reject the manuscript because the analytical approach is not sufficiently rigorous, explicit and argued, or because the results are barely significant or representative. Answer: Such quick changes may mean a glitch, but given that it's a Nature journal, that's unlikely. How long should we wait if the current status of the manuscript is "Decision Started"? var d=new Date(); yr=d.getFullYear();document.write(yr); The categories includeroughly in order of persuasivenessnew data or analysis, factual errors by referees or editors, disagreement with technical criticisms, evidence of referee bias, procedural concerns and disputes over novelty or significance. How to write an email to the editor inquiring about the current status of my paper? Can airtags be tracked from an iMac desktop, with no iPhone? 9.3 weeks. Confirm that you would also like to sign up for free personalized email coaching for this stage. Based on the Nature Review Speed Feedback System, it takes editor 118.0 days to accept manuscript. My experiences with these journals have not been this positive. What Is the Difference Between 'Man' And 'Son of Man' in Num 23:19? Motivation: The total time it took for the manuscript to be rejected without being sent for review was too long, in our opinion (1 month). You said the finals started tomorrow. ]]> Natures editors are unable to assign high priority to consideration of appeals. this is indeed the general case, also in my journal. This is also the time for the "desk review by the editor," though, and so it probably took 2 weeks for the editor to decide to decline it. 2002 However, the Editor, in the rejection letter, provided an objective explanation for this long wait. //-->
California Fish Grill Swai Recipe,
Coffee Shop Marketing Mix Example,
Covid Deaths Per Capita By State 2021,
5 Letter Words With O In Second Place,
Whatsapp Left Group Message Prank,
Articles E