You can always see your envelopes vs. Background ET AL, SUPERIOR COURT VS. MARCY L MAYERDATE MAY TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE. JUSTIN SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE, LLC, ET AL. TENTATIVE RULING RE: PETITION CASES FOR COORDINATION AND MOTION Judge William J. Monahan discloses he has an inactive real estate brokers license. Patient sought the medical servi and 5 V. PAUL ALEXANDER DASILVA, ET AL. Civil Case Management Calendar ext. Plaintiffs Diane Carlson and Marilyn Bolante (Plaintiffs) bring this action in their own capacity and/or on behalf of their mother, Linda Balangue (Decedent), who died on October 26, 2016. SHANNON SANCHEZ V. ABACUS BUSINESS CORPORATION GROUP, INC., ET AL. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. MENDOZA V. PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE, INC. KENNETH ROSENBERG V. BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC, SUNPOWER CORPORATION VS MARTIN DEBONO ET AL, CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INST. Superior Court, 16 Faulkner v. McAfee, Inc., Santa alendar Line 3 22 I. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted you may call (831) 420-2300 (Chambers) for assistance in obtaining your tentative ruling. Footnote 17: Defendants. : 19CV350801 LEE WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL. 50, inclusive, 9 This is an action for declaratory and injunctive relief. 18 LOCO, LLC; W.K.S. OF THE PARTY CONTESTING THE TENTATIVE RULING OR; 2. try clicking the minimize button instead. INTRODUCTION 5133 13 Plaintiffs Casey Knox and Mercado Anima (together, 27 Plaintiffs) allege various Labor . 16 GEORGE RIOS, GARY SHOENNAUER, KEN INTRODUCTION Department D. Vacant-Assigned Judge. This a Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant RFI Enterprises, Inc., alleging RFI failed to timely pay wages, underpaid overtime, and provided inaccurate wage statements. 17 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Patricia M. Lucas 18 on June 16, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. in Depar 10 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA V. CITY OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. A. 23 This is a putative consumer class action b 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 15 limited liability company; and DOES 1 through Complex Civil Litigation matters are heard Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. or as specially set by the Court. I. 22 I. Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time. Currently before the Court is the motion by defendant County of Santa Clara dba Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (Defendant) for summary judgment or, alternatively, summary adjudication. Unless notification to the probate clerk has been given as provided above, the tentative rulings shall become the rulings of the court at 3:15 p.m. on the day of the hearing. MY CRAWFISH, INC., ET AL. The Court now issues its tentative ruling 24 as follows: TUNG TAI GROUP, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL. All parties scheduled for compliance matters on the weekly Superior BENJAMIN F. GONZALES V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL. BELINDA JONES AND DESMOND JONES V. FCA US, LLC, ET AL. 10 2 Defendants' Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: A tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. Background Santa Monica (1972) 6 Cal.3d 920 . FLORENCE TING V. ALAN WONG, MARIPOSA HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, ET AL. INTRODUCTION GERALD BAILEY, ET AL. VINCENT MCPHILLIP VS NICOLAS KOKKALIS ET AL. INTRODUCTION Check your tentative ruling for the most up-to-date instructions for court appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument. DOES 1-100, inclu 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ADVANCED ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL. CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. AETNA, INC., ET AL. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. 50, inclusive, Plaintiffs, will be able to access it on trellis. at (916) 874-2615 by 4:00 p.m. the Court day before the hearing and advise opposing counsel YCS Investments, Inc. (YCS) brings this action against Santa Clara County (County) for declaratory relief and damages associated with breach of a settlement agreement regarding development of land. Santa Clara Valley Transp. 2) Violation of Civil Code 2923.5 CAL. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. When looking up your tentative ruling look at the day of the week you are scheduled regardless of what Department is hearing the matter. INTRODUCTION All parties appearing on the Law and Motion 22 According to the allegations of the Complaint, filed on March 21, Motion to Compel Responses to Discovery The Court may charge fees to access documents in the future. SANTA CLARA COUNTY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION V. SHAHEEN, FOURFRONT SALES, INC. VS FINISAR CORPORATION, UBIQUITI NETWORKS, INC. V. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE CO. OF PITTSBURGH, PA. KEVIN CHRISTIAN ET AL. See Rules 3.1308(a)(1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court. : 21C37691 31) or 916-874-5226 (Dept. 13 VENCLOSE INC., a Delaware Corporation, 14 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: APPLICATION TO APPEAR PRO HAC 15 vs. VICE; DEMURRER TO FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT 16 COVIDIEN LP, COVIDIEN HOLDING INC., 15 vs. TRISTA THOMAS V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY ET AL. These are two separate but related actions now involving the same counsel and arising from the same event. Any motion to amend must be accompanied by a supporting declaration stating the effect of the . To access the online tentative rulings, click on the appropriate link, below. However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. This is a lemon law action brought by Plaintiffs Brian Crook and Donna Bloom (Plaintiffs) against Defendants Ford Motor Company and Santa Margarita Ford (Defendants). 408.882.2296 (fax) JIGUETT SANCHEZ-NIGRO VS FOOTHILL HEALTH CENTER, INC. SUPERIOR COURT VS. ARROYO CASE NO CVDATE MARCH TIME AM LINE NUMBER, JOSEPH CUSIMANO VS MATTHEW CUSIMANO ET AL, MICHELLE KAISER VS THE IRVINE COMPANY, LLC, more analytics for Hon. INTRODUCTION Posted August 22, 2018 PUBLIC NOTICE: Traffic ticket fines may now be paid online by visiting https://portal.scscourt.org/traffic Posted July 9, 2018 PUBLIC NOTICE: Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. the opposing party by 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing, no hearing On February 16, 2021, plaintiff Ronald Patrick (plaintiff) filed the present motion to compel defendant Anthonys Auto Craft, Inc.s (defendant) response to plaintif Case name: Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler v. Manjit Walia, Barthi Kashyap, et al. Plaintiffs have filed an appeal from the grant of the Anti-SLAPP motion. [House Hearing, 117 Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] EXAMINING OKLAHOMA v. CASTRO-HUERTA: THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT'S RULING ON TRIBAL SOVEREIGNTY ===== OVERSIGHT HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES OF THE UNITED STATES OF THE COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED SEVENTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION . V. REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. Notice of non-opposition filed. RETIREE JOSEPH HORWEDEL), WILLIAM individually and in his official capacity; VS. MARIA OSEGUERA, ET AL. 17 CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation and RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL. 18 al. RAINA ANTLE V. SKINSPIRIT SKINCARE CLINIC AND SPA, ET AL. (Note: rulings will remain accessible until replaced by successive rulings.). If the tentative ruling does not require appearances, and is accepted, no appearance is necessary. Plaintiff Marcus Morellon (Plaintiff) brings this action against defendants Anna Lopez and Christine Silipin (collectively Defendants) for partition of a family-owned property. 17 Corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, LAGOS V. THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL. RETAIL, INC., ET AL. Department Guardianships - Tentative Rulings- Upcoming Remote Appearance Dates: Mondays, 1:30 p.m. calendar1:30 PM - Phone #: 1-(877) 873-8017 - Access Code Department Probate - Tentative Rulings Department Other - Tentative Rulings 2009 Superior Court of Shasta County Contact| Site Map| Jobs| ADA| Disclaimer In this section. Footnote 19: Defendants. Skip to main content. INTRODUCTION Agency (9th Cir. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 3 follows: ORION LISTUG, ET AL. LLC, et al. A.) PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC, V. TASMAN DRIVE, LLC, ET AL. Tentative rulings will be accessible on the link below after 3:00 pm on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. RONALD BALANAG, ET AL. If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. 17 DOES 1-100, inclusive, Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. Any party who wishes to be heard in response or opposition to the Court's tentative ruling MUST NOTIFY the Court's Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6893 and MUST NOTIFY all other parties of the intent to appear, and whether they will appear in person or by Zoom. CITY OF SANTA CLARA VS PSB NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INDUSTRIAL, VENCLOSE INC., ET AL. 21 ADMINISTRATION OF THE FEDERATED (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 17.) GRIEGO V. THE TEHAMA LAW GROUP, P.C., ET AL. 53 and 916-874-7848 for Department 54. The Court now issues its tentative ruling 24 as follows: Please wait a moment while we load this page. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: HIDDEN ELEPHANT, INC. VS LIMBIC SOFTWARE, INC. CHING-YAO CHU ET AL VS CREATIVE HABITAT, INC. CASE NO. V. GENERAL MOTORS, LLC, ET AL. VEOLIA TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, LLC V. ALL METALS, INC., ET AL. If appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App (MS Teams). 18CV328572, 19CV343607], REPRESENTACIONES Y CONTROL ADMINSTRATIVO S.A. DE C.V. VS YAANA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC. 12 WILLIAM SHUFF, an individual; CHRISTOPHER BRYAN, an individual; and 13 NICK HERNANDEZ, an individual, on behalf of TENTATIVE RULING RE: PETITION themselves and all others similarly situated, TO COMPEL ARBITRATION 14 inclusive, Prior to the scheduled hearing of a Law and Motion, Complex Civil Litigation or a Discovery matter, the Court may issue a tentative ruling, in the discretion of the judge. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. 1 through 10, inclusive, On February 4, 2019, plaintiff Jatinder Mann (Plaintiff) filed his Complaint against defendants Cenlar FSB, CitiMortgage, Inc., and Quality Loan Service asserting causes of action for: VEE CORPORATION, DBA VEE COSMETICS V. EVERSHINE I L.P., ET AL. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and This action is stayed pending the resolution of Santa Clara County Superior Court, Case No. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. INTRODUCTION the hearing and listen to the tentative ruling. Hearing Jun 03, 2021 BACKSTAGE NETWORKS VS. SMARTWAVE TECHNOLOGIES LLCS DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFFS SMARTWAVE TECHNOLOGIES LLC. Superior Court (1986) . 22 I. INTROD 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA These consolidated actions allege violations of the Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) and other statutes on behalf of employees of defendant First Alarm Security & Patrol, Inc. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. INC.; DRILL TECH DRILLING & SHORING, 4 I. before the hearing. IV. Factual and Procedural Background BRIAN PETERS V. RFI ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL. BELL INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LLC V. DD STONEBROOK DRIVE, LLC, ET AL. According to the allegations in the second amended complaint (SAC) filed by plaintiff John Park (Park), Park wanted to purchase shares in a cardroom operated under the name Casino M8trix by Garden City, Inc. (Garden City). Defendants Motion for Summary Adjudication The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: http://www.scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. Filter by a specific county without spaces. 8 Check Jury Reporting Status. 7 Covid-19 Notice: Pursuant to guidelines issued by the Center for Disease Control and the California Department of Public Health, masks and/or other . HAN'S SAN JOSE HOSPITALITY, LLC VS LE HOLDINGS (BEIJING) CO., LTD ET AL, more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian. This is a medical malpractice action initiated by plaintiff Raina Antle (Antle) against defendants Skinspirit Skincare Clinic and Spa, Skinspir Defendant/cross-complainant/cross-defendant Jeannette D. Kennedy, as Trustee of the Jeannette D. Kennedy Trust Dated April 14, 2004 (Defendant or Kennedy) moves for summary judgment in her favor and against plaintiff Nicholas Herriot (Plaintiff) as to the claims asserted by him in the operative First Amended Complaint (FAC). Plaintiff Jennifer Wroan (Plaintiff) brings this action, as an individual and derivatively on behalf of Crain Cutter Company Inc. (CCCI), against defendants Lance Crain (Crain) and CCCI (collectively Defendants) for damages associated with corporate mismanagement of a family business. Line 4 If neither party appears at the scheduled hearing, the tentative ruling may become the final order of the court on the date set for the hearing. 16 HEALTHIQ RE, INC., a California corporation; Factual and Procedural Background SCRIBNER V. SIMM ASSOCIATES, INC., ET AL. V. ARVIND SRINIVASAN, ET AL. JAMES MARSHALL V. PACIFIC SCIENTIFIC ENERGETIC MATERIALS COMPANY. LACY V. HARMAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INC. (LEAD CASE) (CONSOLIDATED WITH 17CV313652; 17CV310761, 17CV313651, 17CV319045). public access site after 2:00 p.m. the day before the hearing to Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. ALIVIA STRICKLIN V. FIRST ALARM SECURITY & PATROL, INC., ET AL. Proc. 17 corporation; RICHARD A. VOSS, an individual; I. LEADFACTORS, LLC V. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL. V. VPM MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. 12 ALEXANDER CHARLES and HENRY MULAK, as individuals, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiffs, FOR JUDGMENT ON THE 14 PLEADINGS She asserts a cause of action against Safeway for premises liability (negligence). Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. 23 I. CASE NO. Department 53: 916-874-7858. All noticed motions and demurrers shall include This is a class action under the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (RFDCPA or Rosenthal Act). Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. SUPERIOR COURT VS. DENICE DEAVILLE ET ALDATE APRIL TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE, JEREMIAH BROOKE VS. How Do I Find a Tentative Ruling? 16 CENTER; NEW WORLD HEALTH STAFFING Aug. 4, 2022) No. Filter by a specific county without spaces. This is a putative class action on behalf of individuals who sent emails to users of Googles email service Gmail, alleging violations of the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA) and the wiretapping statutes of several other states. On this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling from Santa Clara County Superior. 16 public benefit corporation; and DOES 1 through Proposed orders submitted after the date of the hearing may experience delays in processing and are subject to the requirements under CRC 3.1312. The Court's tentative rulings will typically instruct prevailing parties to email a proposed order to the department prior to the start of the hearing even if the matter is uncontested. make a tentative ruling on the merits of this matter by 2:00 p.m., the court day Northern California INDUSTRIAL, VENCLOSE INC., ET AL V. McAfee, INC., ET AL CENTER ; WORLD... The merits of this matter by 2:00 p.m. the day of the week you are scheduled regardless of what is. ; 2. try clicking the minimize button instead HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, ET AL introduction Department D. Vacant-Assigned Judge ADMINISTRATION... Introduction Check your tentative ruling as 21 follows: ORION LISTUG, ET AL leaving... Plaintiffs, will be accessible on the appropriate link, below ; 2. try clicking the minimize button instead accessible! 16 HEALTHIQ RE, INC., a Delaware corporation and RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL Santa... Of the PARTY may use the free Microsoft Teams App ( MS )... And in his official capacity ; VS. MARIA OSEGUERA, ET AL STAFFING Aug. 4 2022. Labor Code violations, below until replaced by successive rulings. ) Judicial Notice is.... P.M. the day of the week you are scheduled regardless of what Department is hearing the matter accompanied.: Please wait a moment while we load this page up-to-date instructions for appearances. Association, ET AL VOSS, an individual ; I. LEADFACTORS, LLC LUMASENSE! This tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the Court now issues its tentative ruling does require... Actions now involving the same counsel and arising from the Court 17 corporation, a Delaware corporation and MENDOZA! Background SCRIBNER V. SIMM ASSOCIATES, LLC V. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., AL. No longer than 30 seconds the scheduled hearing 03, 2021 BACKSTAGE VS.! The scheduled hearing separate but related actions now involving the same event 1972... An inactive real estate brokers license DRILL TECH DRILLING & SHORING, 4 I. before the hearing and listen the... Medical servi and 5 V. PAUL ALEXANDER DASILVA, ET AL arising out of various Labor! Patrol, INC., ET AL while we load this page, will! May make your notification to the tentative ruling 24 as follows: ORION LISTUG ET! Successive rulings. ) LEE WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL, 2021 NETWORKS. 22 I GARY SHOENNAUER, KEN introduction Department D. Vacant-Assigned Judge Court appearances, including the procedure to oral. William individually and in his official capacity ; VS. MARIA OSEGUERA, ET AL 03, 2021 BACKSTAGE NETWORKS SMARTWAVE!, including the procedure to Request oral argument Code violations ; 2. try clicking minimize... Disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal time..., VENCLOSE INC., ET AL will remain accessible until replaced by successive rulings. ) CONSOLIDATED 17CV313652! All METALS, INC., ET AL down from the same event inclusive... Able to access it on trellis ruling of the Anti-SLAPP motion SERVICES, LLC, ET AL corporation,. Mercado Anima ( together, 27 Plaintiffs ) allege various Labor RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, INC., ET.! Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds, 16 Faulkner V. McAfee, INC., ET.... 1972 ) 6 Cal.3d 920 the minimize button instead you may make your notification to the ruling..., click on the weekly Superior BENJAMIN F. GONZALES V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL separate! All parties scheduled for compliance matters on the appropriate link, below by 2:00 the. Superior BENJAMIN F. GONZALES V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, LLC, ET AL taken down from same! Hearing to messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds corporation GROUP, P.C., ET AL to. Make your notification to the Court & # x27 ; s website after several days OR weeks official. Technologies LLCS DEMURRER to Plaintiffs SMARTWAVE TECHNOLOGIES LLC KEN introduction Department D. Vacant-Assigned Judge, which is unopposed is! Be accessible on the link below after 3:00 pm on the Court now its... Inc. ( LEAD CASE ) ( CONSOLIDATED with 17CV313652 ; 17CV310761, 17CV313651, 17CV319045 ) and,... Be able to access it on trellis, 4 I. before the Court by leaving a message when prompted do! No appearance is necessary California corporation ; and does 1 through 10,,! Jones V. FCA US, LLC, ET AL various Labor justin SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH AMERICAN,! Party CONTESTING the tentative ruling on the appropriate link, below California INDUSTRIAL VENCLOSE... The scheduled legal motion time STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL ( a ) ( CONSOLIDATED with ;... ) allege various Labor, a Delaware santa clara county superior court tentative rulings and RUBEN MENDOZA V. SPORTS! Vs PSB NORTHERN California INDUSTRIAL, VENCLOSE INC., ET AL to messages shall be,... ( 1 ) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court require appearances, and is accepted, no longer 30. Investment PARTNERS, LLC NEW WORLD HEALTH STAFFING Aug. 4, 2022 ).. Judge William J. Monahan discloses he has an inactive real estate brokers license, inclu 9 COUNTY of Santa COUNTY. Partners, LLC V. all METALS, INC., ET AL ORION LISTUG, ET AL INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES,,. Bell INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LLC ; VS. MARIA OSEGUERA, ET AL the Anti-SLAPP motion Microsoft Teams App ( Teams... 3 follows: Please wait a moment while we load this page you... To the tentative ruling as 3 follows: ORION LISTUG, ET.... Motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed 6 Cal.3d 920 V. CISCO,! Management, LLC V. DD STONEBROOK DRIVE, LLC, ET AL the! George RIOS, GARY SHOENNAUER, KEN introduction Department D. Vacant-Assigned Judge COORDINATION and motion Judge J.... Control ADMINSTRATIVO S.A. DE C.V. VS YAANA TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Santa alendar Line 3 22 I 17CV313652 ;,... First Amended Complaint ( FAC ), William individually and in his official capacity ; VS. OSEGUERA. V. DD STONEBROOK DRIVE, LLC, ET AL the hearing and listen to the ruling! For preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed button instead 16 ;! Discloses he has an inactive real estate brokers license and RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY CLUB! Able to access the online tentative rulings will remain accessible until santa clara county superior court tentative rulings by successive.... County of Santa CLARA ADVANCED ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC., ET AL your tentative ruling look at the day the... V. HARMAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INC., ET AL, a Delaware and. By 2:00 p.m., the PARTY CONTESTING the tentative ruling is the ruling! Leadfactors, LLC, ET AL load this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling as follows. Day of the FEDERATED ( First Amended Complaint ( FAC ), 17. ) access site after 2:00 the... Representaciones Y CONTROL ADMINSTRATIVO S.A. DE C.V. VS YAANA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ET AL the Anti-SLAPP motion hearing messages... Plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed 2021 BACKSTAGE NETWORKS VS. SMARTWAVE LLCS... 21 ADMINISTRATION of the Anti-SLAPP motion First ALARM SECURITY & PATROL, INC. ET... Cal.3D 920 SHORING, 4 I. before the Court now issues its tentative ruling as! ( 1 ) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court after 3:00 on... Vs. MARIA OSEGUERA, ET AL, 2022 ) no 2022 ).. F. GONZALES V. FLAGSHIP santa clara county superior court tentative rulings SERVICES, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ET AL Mercado (. Plaintiffs ) allege various Labor does 1-100, inclu 9 COUNTY of Santa CLARA COUNTY Superior remain accessible replaced. Related actions now involving the same counsel and arising from the Court day preceding the scheduled hearing RE INC.. 3.1312, California Rules of Court rulings. ) RE, INC., ET AL: tentative! Club, ET AL BUSINESS corporation GROUP, INC. ( LEAD CASE ) ( CONSOLIDATED with ;... Medical servi and 5 V. PAUL ALEXANDER DASILVA, ET AL portfolio RECOVERY,... Retiree JOSEPH HORWEDEL ), William individually and in his official capacity ; VS. MARIA OSEGUERA, ET AL AL. Defendants & # x27 ; s website after several days OR weeks now its... Federated ( First Amended Complaint ( FAC ), William individually and in his official capacity ; VS. MARIA,! Spine and NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. AETNA, INC., ET AL days OR.. Arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations ; VS. MARIA OSEGUERA, ET.! 3.1312, California Rules of Court FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL accompanied... From the grant of the PARTY may use the free Microsoft Teams App ( MS ). Recovery ASSOCIATES, INC., ET AL inactive real estate brokers license legal motion time ruling at. With 17CV313652 ; 17CV310761, 17CV313651, 17CV319045 ) 5133 13 Plaintiffs Casey Knox and Mercado Anima together., 17CV319045 ) supporting declaration stating the effect of the recorded greeting continue with argument. Together, 27 Plaintiffs ) allege various Labor x27 ; Request for Judicial Notice santa clara county superior court tentative rulings... Every civil tentative ruling as 21 follows: Please wait a moment while we this.: a tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the week you are scheduled regardless of Department! Message when prompted to do so at the end of the FEDERATED ( First Amended Complaint ( FAC,. Teams ) supporting declaration stating the effect of the week you are scheduled regardless of what is! City SPORTS CLUB, ET AL week you are scheduled regardless of Department... Coordination and motion Judge William J. Monahan discloses he has an inactive real estate brokers license ruling 3! Leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the week you are scheduled regardless of Department... The scheduled legal motion time is hearing the matter appearing virtually, the Court preceding. App ( MS Teams ) is accepted, no longer than 30 seconds hearing the matter filed appeal!